Therapies & Treatments

Moving Forward With Motivational Interviewing Therapy

Begin Recovery

Motivational Interviewing was developed by Dr. William R. Miller in the early 1980s. Shortly after, Stephen Rollnick joined Dr. Miller to continue refining the approach. Their textbook, published by Guilford Press, is still available today. Motivational interviewing also draws on the client-centered counseling work of Carl Rogers and the Stages of Change Model developed by James Prochaska and Carlo DiClemente.

The two major goals of motivational interviewing are to help people resolve their ambivalence regarding change and to enhance their personal motivation to make those changes. Motivational Interviewing also seeks to establish a specific change plan that aligns with each person’s own values and goals. It fosters self-efficacy, establishes a strong rapport with the therapist, and supports clients as they progress through the stages of change at their own pace.

Some common examples include:

  • “What concerns you most about your current behavior?”
  • “How would your life look if you were able to make this change?”
  • “What did you try previously that worked, no matter how small?”
  • “On a scale of 1 to 10, how important is this change to you? Why?”

These types of open-ended questions promote reflection rather than simple yes or no responses.

The four primary techniques are known collectively by the acronym OARS: open-ended questions, affirmations, reflective listening, and summarization. Clinical staff also employ additional techniques such as examining ambivalence, encouraging change-oriented communication (“change talk”), working with resistance (“rolling with resistance”), and building self-confidence to encourage patients to generate their own reasons for wanting to change.

Benefits include enhanced participation in treatment, reduced substance use, a stronger therapeutic relationship, improved medication compliance, and a greater likelihood of long-term success — especially for those entering treatment feeling ambivalent or pressured by others to change instead of wanting it for themself. Many patients also report that MI feels more collaborative compared to more directive forms of counseling, particularly in the early stages of recovery.

[1] [7]Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2020). Using motivational interviewing in substance use disorder treatment (Advisory No. PEP20-02-02-014). https://library.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/PEP20-02-02-014.pdf 

[2] Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2009). Ten things that motivational interviewing is not. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465809005128 

 

[3] Prochaska and DiClemente’s Stages of Change model for Social workers. (2025, June 23). Yeshiva University Online. https://online.yu.edu/wurzweiler/blog/prochaska-and-diclementes-stages-of-change-model-for-social-workers  

 

[4] [6] Lundahl, B., Moleni, T., Burke, B. L., Butters, R., Tollefson, D., Butler, C., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Patient Education and Counseling, 93(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.012 

[5] Burke, B. L., Arkowitz, H., & Menchola, M. (2003). The efficacy of motivational interviewing: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(5), 843–861. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.71.5.843

Call Now Button